20?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ??? ‘?? ???’??? ???. ??? ??????? ???? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??.

?? ? ?? ????? ?(州)????? ??? ??(Michael Eakin)??? ??? ??? ???? ? ?? ?(詩)? ? ??? ???. ?(??)? ??? ? ??? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??.

????(Julia Zangrando·?)? ??? ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?? ??? 1150??? ???? ??? ? 1??? ????. ????? ? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??? ????? ??? ?? ???? ??? ?. ????? ??? 5? ? ??????? ??? ??? 59?? ??(韻文)?? ??? ?? ??.

?? ??? ????? ????? ????, ?? ??(主文) ?? ??? ??? ?? 22?? ???? ?? ????. ?? ?? ?? ?? ??? ??(??).

‘?????? ?? ???? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??.

???? ? ?? ????? ??? ???? ??? ???, ???? ??? ???. ?? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ???? ?? ???? ??? ?? ?? ????.

?? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ??? ??? ?? ???.

??(???)? ???? ?? ????? ? ? ?? ??.

??? ?? ??? ?? ?? ?. ?? ????? ???? ?? ? ?? ??? ??? ??.

??? “???? ?????? ??? ?????”? ??? ?? ? ?? ?, ?? ? ?? ???? ????.

??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??. ??? ?? ??? ???? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ????.

? ????? ??? ?? ?????, ????? ????? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?? ? ?? ?.

1? ??? ???? ???? ????? ? ?? ?, ?? ???? 1?? ?? ???? ? ??? ?? ???. ??? ??? ??? ??? ????.’

??? ??? ????? ???? ?? ???? ?? ??? ???? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???.

????? ???(Kress)? “??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ?? ?”??? ???.

??????? ???? ???? ????? ??(?)? ?(??)? ?? ??? ? ?? ‘???’? ????. ?? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ???? ?? ????? ???? ???? ???. ?? ??? ?? ??? ?? ? ??? ??? ‘??? ??’? ?????.

??? ?? ?????? “?? ??? ??? ???? ?? ??? ???? ?? ??? ?? ?”??? “??? ???? ?? ???? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ??”? ???.

sooh@donga.com

▼詩? ? ???▼

The poodles waited for the car, and

wacthed as it drew near,

thinking there was naught at all to cause

them any fear.

For often cars would pass them by, but

this was no wayfare――

the car began to veer toward them and

caution turned to terror.

The car was coming way too close,

sometiong inside told her;

The next thing Mrs. Zangrando knew,

a poodle flew over her shoulder.

But Sipula didn’t testfy he saw the dog

dash to the street,

yet he’d have this court assume such

caused the dog and car to meet.

Even if the poodle strained to reach the

leashes’end,

applellant veered toward Angel, testimony we may not amend,

Unexpected perils do from time to time

arise

whose suddenness may obviate the fault

in our law’s eyes.

But while appellant touts this rule, no

matter how it’s styled

He needs to have us find the dog was

llike the darting child,

and there simply is no evidence that

Angel did such darting

begore the car ran into her,trajctory

imparting.

Be it interstate or neighborhood, drivings

gets no free shot

at things they may encounter, whether in

the street or not.

So while counsel raises issues that are

worthy and well taken

in the end, we find the effort to apply

them here’s mistaken.

We must conclude the issues raised do

not warrant a new trial

and all that we may offer now is this

respectful, rhymed denial.

sooya@donga.com